On our last posting, we revealed the second marriage of Catherine (Foy) REIF, to Samuel NEITZ in 1869. The pension detectives found the paperwork to prove this marriage, and no paperwork that Catherine had reported the marriage. That would have suspended her pension support from the government. She continued to receive support during this second marriage. Catharine's pension support ended June 6, 1875, upon her marriage to Simon Geeting, who passed away in 1905.
page 178-179/220 of the Reif Civil War Pension files
The Declaration for Widow's Pension, Act of September 8, 1916. Notice: this can be executed before a Notary Public, Justice of the Peace, or a Court of Record, or any officer duly qualified to administer oaths.
This form is typed, with a notation that the official is a Justice of the Peace. Catherine Geeting is now aged 73, still living in Forreston, Ogle County, Illinois. Furthermore, it repeats all of the facts regarding Ernst Reif and his service in the U.S. Army, Company H of the 34th Illinois Infantry. It confirms that she was married to Ernst (the second time, because the first could not be proven from 1861) on October 4, 1863, officiated by Rev. J.K. Bloom. Catherine Geeting has signed her name to this document. Also signing as witnesses to the document: Jacob F. SWANK and High S. STANLEY, both of Forreston, Illinois. Cyrus BILLIG has signed as the Justice of the Peace, dated October 14, 1916.
Page 180/220 The official record of the second marriage of Catherine
The affidavit from the county clerk of Ogle County, in the town of Oregon:
I, Robert F. Adams, clerk of the county court in and for said county, hereby certify that Samuel L. Neitz and Mrs. Catherine Rife (sp) were joined in Matrimony on the 20th day of May, 1869 by J. N. MOHR, Minister of the Gospel in the said county, as appears on the records in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said county, at Oregon, Illinois this the 24th day of February, 1917. signed Robert F. ADAMS, clerk of the county court, Lillie SHELLEY, Dep. Clerk
Page 181-186/220 The Divorce Decree: Catherine vs Samuel
handwritten document, dated January 31, 1873, State of Illinois, County of Ogle, Circuit Court
Catherine NEITZ appears with her attorney, Thomas J. HEWITT, with summons issued against Samuel L. Neitz. The county Sheriff has returned the summons to the court, without being able to find Samuel in this county, and inability to locate him elsewhere. Proof of the publication of this summons was shown to the court, and approved. It was considered that Samuel NEITZ has willfully deserted Catherine for over two years without just cause, since the ninth day of September, AD 1869. Catherine has received no word or support from Samuel during this time. It has been decreed that the bonds of matrimony between both parties are hereby dissolved. Both parties are at liberty to marry again in like manner as if they had never been married. Catherine was ordered to pay the costs and charges of the court of this suit. Signed by W. W. HEATON, Judge.
Clerk of the Circuit Court notes that he certified the foregoing decree is a true, full and perfect copy of the decree in the said case as appears in the records of his office, Record E Chancery, page 210
signed H.P. LASON, clerk. The gold seal of the county is affixed to this document
Page 187/220 General Affidavit, Henrietta Swank
Sister of Catherine, Henrietta Swank, age 63, appears in the matter of Catherine Geeting, formerly widow of Ernst C. Reif, deceased veteran. She testifies her statement to the Notary Public, William H. HETRICK, age 69, both being residents of the town of Forreston, Ogle County, Illinois. The statement reads that Catharine is will known to the Swanks, and know from personal knowledge that she has never married since the death of her late husband, Simon Geeting, and that they are of such close acquaintance with her, as that they would have known if she had re-married, and that at this date she is still unmarried. Both Henrietta Swank and William H. HETRICK sign the document. Notary Public, Joseph M Myers, certifies this document.
Page 188-191/220 Rejection of the Widow's Request
Rejection on the grounds of no title under the Act of March 3, 1901, Catherine was not proven to be the wife of the soldier during the period of his military service, even though cohabitation and the birth of a son, soon deceased, occurred prior to his return from service. Only the marriage decree of 1863 was recognized. signed by the legal examiner, R. L. FORD. This document goes further to say the claimant, Catherine Geeting, does not write.
Page 192-195/220 Index, Tally sheet for the claim of Catherine Geeting, remarried widow of Ernst Reif
The page mentions 19 records of proof of marriages, co-habitation, soldier's disability, dependency and general assessment of the case using the testimony of the listed persons who have been previously mentioned. Following are copies of claims submitted by Catherine, supposedly signed by Catherine (remember that the rejection notice stated that Catherine did not write)
So, dated Dec 13, 1905, Edward Haller, Notary Public, swears that Jacob F. PYFER and Minnie H. GEETING, both of Forreston, Illinois, witnessed Catherine Geeting sign her name to the documents, and that they have both known her for thirty years and twenty-five years, respectively. Signatures of both appear on this witness document. The signatures look eerily like that of the script used for the signature of Catherine Geeting, known to not be able to write.
Pages 196-203/220 Letters from Congress and the Pension Bureau, 1917
Apparently, someone (Mr. Edward HALLER???) had been inquiring about the status of Catherine's widow's claim for support. There are a series of letters written to Mrs. Catherine GEETING, from the Pension Commissioner, G.M. SALTAGABER,regarding her widow's claim. A February letter asks her to send some proof of her marriage to Knight (meaning NEITZ) and a death of him or divorce decree. Also, they ask her to send testimonies of persons having knowledge of her and her marriages. Haven't we been down this road previously?
Also, letters to and from the State Representative, John C. McKENZIE, House of Representatives, stating that this claim of Catherine's has been rejected because of her multiple marriages. They mention the Widow's claim filed in October of 1916, being the last one filed and rejected, along with all documentation attached.....the ones with Catherine's signature......and she could not write.????
There is a letter from acting commissioner, E.C. TIEMAN, to Rep. John McKENZIE, House of Representatives, Wash. DC, stating that the claim of Catherine's is now being considered! What? This letter is dated July 6, 1917. They previously said it had been rejected.
Pages 204-215/220 Repeated records of files previously in this claim packet
Pages 216-218/220 Folded forms filed for the support of the minor child of Ernst Reif
Ludwig FOY, father of Catherine, was named the legal guardian the child of Ernst REIF, Mary REIF. The support payments were given to Ludwig Foy, until the 16th birthday of Mary REIF.
Page 219/220 A letter to Representative Frank O. LOWDEN, June 1, 1907
From the office of the Acting Commissioner of the Pension Bureau, stating that Catherine's pension claim as a remarried, but now widow, dated 1906, filed by herself without representation had been rejected because it could not be proven that she was the lawful wife of Ernst REIF on the day of his enlistment into military service, as required by the provisions of the pension act. This, indeed was the last claim that Catherine, herself, had filed.
The claims submitted after this were inducted by Edward HALLER, himself, as was his practice until he was finally caught. He insisted that widows asked him to file for pensions, and if so awarded, they would give him part of the support payments.
Page 220/220 the ending cover of this lengthy soap opera.
Edward HALLER did not have a good future. In 1919, he was accused of having a cache of alcohol in the attic of his drug store in Forreston, Illinois. His store was raided and he was arrested. Federal officers took the 1200 whisky bottles stash. Apparently, Mr. HALLER had the alcohol shipped into the county under the label, "Malted Milk". The federal agents followed the purchase of the booze in Chicago, which had been shipped in barrels to Harper, Illinois. It was then transported by team and wagon to Forreston, Illinois under cover of night. The final delivery was made at midnight at Haller's Drugstore. He was prosecuted under the Illinois search and seizure act, and under the Federal war-time prohibition act. He claimed that he had no intention of breaking the laws, and had the right to store the wet goods for legitimate purposes.
Showing posts with label Foy family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foy family. Show all posts
Sunday, April 2, 2017
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Using Civil War Pension Records, Part V, The Case of Ernst C. Reif
Affidavit of Edward E. Haller in Regard to a Pension for Catharine Geeting the Widow of Simon Geeting, continued:
PAGES 14 and 15
Hugh S. Stanley, gives his testimony on this page, stating that he is over 62 years, and has lived his entire life in Forreston, Illinois. He says that he is personally acquainted with Catherine Geeting (nee Foy), widow of Simon Geeting and Ernest C. Reif, Civil War Veteran. She is described as being about 72 years, and has been trying to be awarded a Widow's Pension for many years, but unsuccessful. Hugh S. Stanley says that he tried to enlist in the US Army before he was of legal age, twice, but his guardian would not approve, but finally was accepted and served his full term. He noted that Catherine Geeting currently owns a small house worth about $750, and she has not means of support except for her daily labor. She holds no allegiance to foreign royalty, and holds true allegiance to the United States of America. He says that he is acquainted with all persons interviewed in this matter, such as Mrs. Henrietta Swank, wife of Jacob F. Swank, deputy Factory Inspector, Township Supervisor and School President of the Board of Trustees. Mr. Stanley admits that he did not know of the marriage of Catherine Foy and Ernst Reif in 1861. However, he did remember that her parents encouraged them to remarry, and that he knew the Rev. N. W. Lilly, late, of Kansas City, Missouri who officiated the first marriage, and Rev. J. K. Bloom, who performed the second marriage. He helped to haul the bricks for the building of the Lutheran Church. Rev. N. W. Lilly spoke to Mr. Stanley in 1892 about the loss of the marriage license from 1861, and no records could be found in Ogle County, Illinois. Witnessed and signed on 5 March 1913, by Hugh S. Stanley, Witnesses W. F. Gerwig and Geo. J. Gersbaugh. Edward Haller signed as Notary Public, 10 March 1913.
PAGE 16
Robert F. Adams, County Clerk, testifies that he is in custody of all files and records for the county of Ogle, which include assessments of property for taxation. He states that in 1904, Simon Geeting was assessed with real estate as follows : North 1/2 of Lots 14 & 15 Block 3 of Neal addition to the Village of Forreston, assessed value of $150, No personal property was assessed in the name of Simon Geeting. Personal property was assess in the name of Catharine Geeting to the amount of $230.. He certifies that the assessed values represents twenty percent of the true value thereof. Robert F. Adams signed his statement 11 Dec, 1905.
PAGE 17
Edward Haller makes his statement the on 10 December 1912 Catherine Geeting appeared before him. She revealed that she was born 31 August 1841, currently 71 years, living in Forreston, Ogle County, Illinois, and wishes to place her name on the Pension roll under the acts of March 3 1901 and February 28th 1903, amending Section 4708 Revised Statuary. She was the former widow of Ernst Reif, who died 19 October 1867 from wounds received while serving as a soldier. She was his lawful wife during the time he was in service. She had been married clandestine to Ernest Reif in 1861 and no record was ever found of this marriage. She maintained their home until he come out of the army as wounded, and was advised to remarry 4 October 1863. They had a daughter about two years of age in 1863. She remained his wife until his death. The soldier was not in the military before 1861. She and a child were formerly pensioned on account of the death of her husband, paid by the pension agent at Chicago, her certificate number being 184488, and she never applied for a pension again until the death of her husband Simon Geeting in 1905. Her pension had been terminated because of her marriage to Simon Geeting. Simon Geeting died 1 March 1905, and she was never divorced, and Simon Geeting did not serve in the Army or Navy. She has no means of support other than her daily labor, and an actual net income not exceeding $250 per year. It shows a signature of Catharine Geeting, and signatures of witnesses as Minnie Geeting and Hugh S. Stanley. Edward Haller signs as the Notary Public on 10 December 1912.
PAGE 18-20 DECLARATION OF A WIDOW WHO HAS REMARRIED
Dated 4 March 1913, Catherine Geeting, age 73, appears to make her sworn statement for the purpose of putting her name on the Pension Roll, under the Act of March 3. 1901 and February 28, 1903 amending Section 4708 Revised Statutes. It repeats the facts that she was the former widow of Ernest C. Reif, deceased veteran and she was his lawful wife through marriages preformed by Rev. Lilly in 1861 and Rev. J.K. Bloom in 1863, to satisfy the advise of her parents when no marriage license could be found from the first wedding. She admits that one child was born to her and Ernst Reif in 1862, and she took care of the home and child, until the death of the infant at about 10 months of age. The Child was laid to west in White Oak Cemetery, just west of the town of Forreston. She and her second child Mayme LaShelle (nee Reif) were formerly pensioned from the death of Ernst Reif. Ernst Reif was laid to rest beside their first child, in White Oak Cemetery. Her pension was terminated due to her marriage to Simon Geeting, in1875. When Simon passed away, he was also buried in White Oak Cemetery. She was never divorced from either husband. Her sole means of support does not exceed $250 annually. She has been without pension support since her marriage to Mr. Geeting, and she now files for her claims because of her advanced and age and humble circumstances. There is a signature of Catharine Geeting, her mark, dated 4 March 1913. Charles W. Price and Justus DeGraff was signed witnesses. Edward Haller signed as Notary Public.
PAGE 21-22
In the City of Freeport, County of Stephenson, Illinois, Louisa Lawver makes her sworn statement. She states that when she was 8 years, she came west with her people to Illinois, and lived near Forreston for 21 years. She was personally acquainted with Ernst Reif, deceased. She knew that he had mustered into the Army at the first call for soldiers, and he had a gun shot wound to this left leg while in the line of duty, and knew that he had died from his wound in 1867. She had been a friend of the Reif family, and she sat at his side several days before he passed. Louisa Lawver was a nurse. She saw his wound and knew that he had infection and was in great pain. The wound was repulsive to the eye. She attended the funeral performed by Rev. N.W. Lilly at the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Forreston and officiated at the last sad rite of the veteran. She knew Ernst Reif as a strong healthy man, and it was hard to see him become lame. She stated that Ernst Reif had been a cabinet maker and very good carpenter. He was also the janitor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Forreston. She felt that he received a small compensation from his pension and had a hard time supporting himself, his wife and little daughter. This statement is signed by Louisa Lawver on May 1908, City of Freeport. Witness signatures were Gertrude Blunt and Henry W. Foy. Notary Public, Wilber Goddard, signed and dated the document May 1908.
PAGE 23-24
In the City of Freeport, County of Stephenson, Illinois, Henry W. Foy makes his sworn statement.
He states that he was born in the state of Pennsylvania in 1847. When he was 17, his parents moved the family west and they settled in Ogle County, Illinois. He now lives in Freeport, Stephenson County, Illinois, and has lived there for the past 24 years. Henry Foy says that he was very well acquainted with Ernest C. Reif, deceased, and that he was in 1861 engaged to marry his sister, Catherine Foy. But, at the first call for soldiers to put down the Rebellion, Ernst Reif was one of the first men to respond to the call. He knew of the wound in the left leg that was received on the field of battle. From the story told him by Ernst Reif, he laid without medical aid, being hemmed in by the rebels. Ernest Reif was discharged in 1863 on account of the injury. He came home lame and the wound would break open at times and caused soreness at the hip joint. His sister, Catherine Foy, married Ernst Reif in 1863 and he had become the sexton of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Forreston. He worked at his trade as a cabinet maker until he could no longer do that on account of his limb. Ernst Reif often showed Henry Foy his wound, and was not surprised that he had passed from the complications of this injury. Henry Foy attended the funeral to White Oak Cemetery in Forreston, and the brothers and sisters and parents followed the remains to the burial. He knew Catherine had received a pension from the US Government Pension Office until her marriage to Simon Geeting. He knew that his sister had reapplied for support in 1905, but was denied because she had no proof of being married to Ernst Reif before the war of 1861-1865. Henry W. Foy signs his statement on 8 May, 1908. Witnesses signed include W. Goddard and Bertha Sheffner (?). Wilbur Goddard signs as Notary Public on 8 May, 1908
PAGES 25-26
In Kansas City, the County of Jackson, Missouri, N. W. Lilly makes his sworn statement that he is over 7 years, and that in 1867 he was the pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Forreston, Illinois. He was personally acquainted with Ernest C. Reif, during his stay in Forreston, and admitted that Mr. Reif had been the sexton for a number of years of this church. He showed that on page 64 of his records, Ernest Reif and Catherine Foy were married by J. K. Bloom, former pastor of this church, on 4 October 1863. He supports the story of Ernst Reif being a soldier and that he was wounded during battle, and returned home because of the wound. Ernst Reif died in his home across the street from the church. Rev. Lilly states that he lived less than 2 blocks from the Reif Family. The Reverend also stated that he was at the bedside of Ernst Reif at his death, and officiated the funeral at the church and to the burial at White Oak Cemetery. He stated that Catherine Reif, widow, her parents and brothers and sisters followed the procession to the grave site. He states that he makes this statement in support of the case of Catherine Geeting, for her future support. N.W.Lilly signs this document on 30 April 1908, Witnesses signed are W. Lake Henry and G. W. Lilly. Notary Public M. J. Oslergard (?) signs on May 1908.
PAGE 27, plus notes
Act of September 8, 1916, Remarried Widow's Pension, OTF. no. 184.188
Claimant "Catharine Geeting, former widow of Soldier : Ernst C. Reif
P.O. Forreston Rank : Private; Co. H
County: Ogle; State, Illinois Regiment, 34th Illinois Inf.
Payments on all former certificates covering any portion of same time to be deducted,
None
REJECTED
Submitted for Rejection, July 5, 1917;
Approved for: Rejection: the claimant has no title to renewal of pension as the former widow of the soldier, Ernest C. Reif, having contracted more than one marriage since his death.
Widow was pensioned at 8 dollars per month under general law
Soldier was pensioned at 4 dollars per month under general law
Enlisted September 7 1861, Claimant's application under other laws, October 28, 1876 and
December 1, 1905
Honorably discharged June 4, 1863 Former Marriages, NONE
Reenlisted, No other service Divorce of former NONE
Died October 19, 1867 Claimant's marriage to soldier, Oct 4, 1863
Declaration Filed Oct 6, 1916 Claimant's marriages : May 20, 1869
Divorce : January 21 1870
Remarried; June 6, 1875
Claimant alleged 73 years Death of last husband; March 7, 1905
Claimant DOES write
Signed by the Honorable John C McKenzie, MC
notes: This claim REJECTED on the grounds that there has been more than one marriage.
Note 2: Claimant's 1st remarriage was to Samuel Neitz, May 20, 1869, yet she continued to draw pension as the widow of the soldier, Reif, until June 6, 1875, when she married for the 3rd time to Geeting.
NEXT UP: A Forgotten Marriage and Divorce, Oh, My, " I forgot to stop taking pension payments through it all", claims Catherine (Foy) Reif, remarried to Samual L Neitz.
PAGES 14 and 15
Hugh S. Stanley, gives his testimony on this page, stating that he is over 62 years, and has lived his entire life in Forreston, Illinois. He says that he is personally acquainted with Catherine Geeting (nee Foy), widow of Simon Geeting and Ernest C. Reif, Civil War Veteran. She is described as being about 72 years, and has been trying to be awarded a Widow's Pension for many years, but unsuccessful. Hugh S. Stanley says that he tried to enlist in the US Army before he was of legal age, twice, but his guardian would not approve, but finally was accepted and served his full term. He noted that Catherine Geeting currently owns a small house worth about $750, and she has not means of support except for her daily labor. She holds no allegiance to foreign royalty, and holds true allegiance to the United States of America. He says that he is acquainted with all persons interviewed in this matter, such as Mrs. Henrietta Swank, wife of Jacob F. Swank, deputy Factory Inspector, Township Supervisor and School President of the Board of Trustees. Mr. Stanley admits that he did not know of the marriage of Catherine Foy and Ernst Reif in 1861. However, he did remember that her parents encouraged them to remarry, and that he knew the Rev. N. W. Lilly, late, of Kansas City, Missouri who officiated the first marriage, and Rev. J. K. Bloom, who performed the second marriage. He helped to haul the bricks for the building of the Lutheran Church. Rev. N. W. Lilly spoke to Mr. Stanley in 1892 about the loss of the marriage license from 1861, and no records could be found in Ogle County, Illinois. Witnessed and signed on 5 March 1913, by Hugh S. Stanley, Witnesses W. F. Gerwig and Geo. J. Gersbaugh. Edward Haller signed as Notary Public, 10 March 1913.
PAGE 16
Robert F. Adams, County Clerk, testifies that he is in custody of all files and records for the county of Ogle, which include assessments of property for taxation. He states that in 1904, Simon Geeting was assessed with real estate as follows : North 1/2 of Lots 14 & 15 Block 3 of Neal addition to the Village of Forreston, assessed value of $150, No personal property was assessed in the name of Simon Geeting. Personal property was assess in the name of Catharine Geeting to the amount of $230.. He certifies that the assessed values represents twenty percent of the true value thereof. Robert F. Adams signed his statement 11 Dec, 1905.
PAGE 17
Edward Haller makes his statement the on 10 December 1912 Catherine Geeting appeared before him. She revealed that she was born 31 August 1841, currently 71 years, living in Forreston, Ogle County, Illinois, and wishes to place her name on the Pension roll under the acts of March 3 1901 and February 28th 1903, amending Section 4708 Revised Statuary. She was the former widow of Ernst Reif, who died 19 October 1867 from wounds received while serving as a soldier. She was his lawful wife during the time he was in service. She had been married clandestine to Ernest Reif in 1861 and no record was ever found of this marriage. She maintained their home until he come out of the army as wounded, and was advised to remarry 4 October 1863. They had a daughter about two years of age in 1863. She remained his wife until his death. The soldier was not in the military before 1861. She and a child were formerly pensioned on account of the death of her husband, paid by the pension agent at Chicago, her certificate number being 184488, and she never applied for a pension again until the death of her husband Simon Geeting in 1905. Her pension had been terminated because of her marriage to Simon Geeting. Simon Geeting died 1 March 1905, and she was never divorced, and Simon Geeting did not serve in the Army or Navy. She has no means of support other than her daily labor, and an actual net income not exceeding $250 per year. It shows a signature of Catharine Geeting, and signatures of witnesses as Minnie Geeting and Hugh S. Stanley. Edward Haller signs as the Notary Public on 10 December 1912.
PAGE 18-20 DECLARATION OF A WIDOW WHO HAS REMARRIED
Dated 4 March 1913, Catherine Geeting, age 73, appears to make her sworn statement for the purpose of putting her name on the Pension Roll, under the Act of March 3. 1901 and February 28, 1903 amending Section 4708 Revised Statutes. It repeats the facts that she was the former widow of Ernest C. Reif, deceased veteran and she was his lawful wife through marriages preformed by Rev. Lilly in 1861 and Rev. J.K. Bloom in 1863, to satisfy the advise of her parents when no marriage license could be found from the first wedding. She admits that one child was born to her and Ernst Reif in 1862, and she took care of the home and child, until the death of the infant at about 10 months of age. The Child was laid to west in White Oak Cemetery, just west of the town of Forreston. She and her second child Mayme LaShelle (nee Reif) were formerly pensioned from the death of Ernst Reif. Ernst Reif was laid to rest beside their first child, in White Oak Cemetery. Her pension was terminated due to her marriage to Simon Geeting, in1875. When Simon passed away, he was also buried in White Oak Cemetery. She was never divorced from either husband. Her sole means of support does not exceed $250 annually. She has been without pension support since her marriage to Mr. Geeting, and she now files for her claims because of her advanced and age and humble circumstances. There is a signature of Catharine Geeting, her mark, dated 4 March 1913. Charles W. Price and Justus DeGraff was signed witnesses. Edward Haller signed as Notary Public.
PAGE 21-22
In the City of Freeport, County of Stephenson, Illinois, Louisa Lawver makes her sworn statement. She states that when she was 8 years, she came west with her people to Illinois, and lived near Forreston for 21 years. She was personally acquainted with Ernst Reif, deceased. She knew that he had mustered into the Army at the first call for soldiers, and he had a gun shot wound to this left leg while in the line of duty, and knew that he had died from his wound in 1867. She had been a friend of the Reif family, and she sat at his side several days before he passed. Louisa Lawver was a nurse. She saw his wound and knew that he had infection and was in great pain. The wound was repulsive to the eye. She attended the funeral performed by Rev. N.W. Lilly at the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Forreston and officiated at the last sad rite of the veteran. She knew Ernst Reif as a strong healthy man, and it was hard to see him become lame. She stated that Ernst Reif had been a cabinet maker and very good carpenter. He was also the janitor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Forreston. She felt that he received a small compensation from his pension and had a hard time supporting himself, his wife and little daughter. This statement is signed by Louisa Lawver on May 1908, City of Freeport. Witness signatures were Gertrude Blunt and Henry W. Foy. Notary Public, Wilber Goddard, signed and dated the document May 1908.
PAGE 23-24
In the City of Freeport, County of Stephenson, Illinois, Henry W. Foy makes his sworn statement.
He states that he was born in the state of Pennsylvania in 1847. When he was 17, his parents moved the family west and they settled in Ogle County, Illinois. He now lives in Freeport, Stephenson County, Illinois, and has lived there for the past 24 years. Henry Foy says that he was very well acquainted with Ernest C. Reif, deceased, and that he was in 1861 engaged to marry his sister, Catherine Foy. But, at the first call for soldiers to put down the Rebellion, Ernst Reif was one of the first men to respond to the call. He knew of the wound in the left leg that was received on the field of battle. From the story told him by Ernst Reif, he laid without medical aid, being hemmed in by the rebels. Ernest Reif was discharged in 1863 on account of the injury. He came home lame and the wound would break open at times and caused soreness at the hip joint. His sister, Catherine Foy, married Ernst Reif in 1863 and he had become the sexton of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Forreston. He worked at his trade as a cabinet maker until he could no longer do that on account of his limb. Ernst Reif often showed Henry Foy his wound, and was not surprised that he had passed from the complications of this injury. Henry Foy attended the funeral to White Oak Cemetery in Forreston, and the brothers and sisters and parents followed the remains to the burial. He knew Catherine had received a pension from the US Government Pension Office until her marriage to Simon Geeting. He knew that his sister had reapplied for support in 1905, but was denied because she had no proof of being married to Ernst Reif before the war of 1861-1865. Henry W. Foy signs his statement on 8 May, 1908. Witnesses signed include W. Goddard and Bertha Sheffner (?). Wilbur Goddard signs as Notary Public on 8 May, 1908
PAGES 25-26
In Kansas City, the County of Jackson, Missouri, N. W. Lilly makes his sworn statement that he is over 7 years, and that in 1867 he was the pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Forreston, Illinois. He was personally acquainted with Ernest C. Reif, during his stay in Forreston, and admitted that Mr. Reif had been the sexton for a number of years of this church. He showed that on page 64 of his records, Ernest Reif and Catherine Foy were married by J. K. Bloom, former pastor of this church, on 4 October 1863. He supports the story of Ernst Reif being a soldier and that he was wounded during battle, and returned home because of the wound. Ernst Reif died in his home across the street from the church. Rev. Lilly states that he lived less than 2 blocks from the Reif Family. The Reverend also stated that he was at the bedside of Ernst Reif at his death, and officiated the funeral at the church and to the burial at White Oak Cemetery. He stated that Catherine Reif, widow, her parents and brothers and sisters followed the procession to the grave site. He states that he makes this statement in support of the case of Catherine Geeting, for her future support. N.W.Lilly signs this document on 30 April 1908, Witnesses signed are W. Lake Henry and G. W. Lilly. Notary Public M. J. Oslergard (?) signs on May 1908.
PAGE 27, plus notes
Act of September 8, 1916, Remarried Widow's Pension, OTF. no. 184.188
Claimant "Catharine Geeting, former widow of Soldier : Ernst C. Reif
P.O. Forreston Rank : Private; Co. H
County: Ogle; State, Illinois Regiment, 34th Illinois Inf.
Payments on all former certificates covering any portion of same time to be deducted,
None
REJECTED
Submitted for Rejection, July 5, 1917;
Approved for: Rejection: the claimant has no title to renewal of pension as the former widow of the soldier, Ernest C. Reif, having contracted more than one marriage since his death.
Widow was pensioned at 8 dollars per month under general law
Soldier was pensioned at 4 dollars per month under general law
Enlisted September 7 1861, Claimant's application under other laws, October 28, 1876 and
December 1, 1905
Honorably discharged June 4, 1863 Former Marriages, NONE
Reenlisted, No other service Divorce of former NONE
Died October 19, 1867 Claimant's marriage to soldier, Oct 4, 1863
Declaration Filed Oct 6, 1916 Claimant's marriages : May 20, 1869
Divorce : January 21 1870
Remarried; June 6, 1875
Claimant alleged 73 years Death of last husband; March 7, 1905
Claimant DOES write
Signed by the Honorable John C McKenzie, MC
notes: This claim REJECTED on the grounds that there has been more than one marriage.
Note 2: Claimant's 1st remarriage was to Samuel Neitz, May 20, 1869, yet she continued to draw pension as the widow of the soldier, Reif, until June 6, 1875, when she married for the 3rd time to Geeting.
NEXT UP: A Forgotten Marriage and Divorce, Oh, My, " I forgot to stop taking pension payments through it all", claims Catherine (Foy) Reif, remarried to Samual L Neitz.
Friday, February 21, 2014
Old Probate Papers from Illinois Ancestors
Two things that are certain, death and taxes.....so they say.
And along with death comes the final papers of each deceased person, be it a will and/or probate records.
I have found two probate records belonging to two ancestors in my husband's family. Because of modern technology, we can now see digitized copies of these papers.
22 October 1867, Ogle County, IL
Probate Record of Ernst C. Reif, deceased 19 October 1867, of Forreston, IL
And along with death comes the final papers of each deceased person, be it a will and/or probate records.
I have found two probate records belonging to two ancestors in my husband's family. Because of modern technology, we can now see digitized copies of these papers.
22 October 1867, Ogle County, IL
Probate Record of Ernst C. Reif, deceased 19 October 1867, of Forreston, IL
The father-in-law of Ernst Reif appeared before the Judge, Sheriff and County Clerk. Ernst Reif had died intestate....he did not have a will. The petitioner, Ludwig Foy, knows that Ernst, owned a home and a lot, a set of carpenter's tools, and household of furniture. His heirs were Catherine (Foy), his wife and Mary M. Reif, a child. Ludwig identifies himself as the father-in-law of the deceased.
Ludwig posted a Three Hundred Dollar bond, as required by the law, when he acted as administrator for his son-in-law, as his daughter waived her right to act as such, and probably was too distraught to do so, seeing she had a small child to care for.
At the top of the second page, entitled Estate of Ernest C. Reif, Administrator's Bond, there is a notation that the petitioner swears that the estate is worth less than $1,000.
At the end of the Letters of Administration, Ludwig Foy, as administrator, agrees that the third Monday of December will be set aside for settling all adjustments and claims against the estate.
So that is what a probate assignment record looks like from Ogle County, Illinois in 1867.
Next, we have a record from a neighboring Illinois county....Whiteside
9 September 1883, Whiteside County, IL
Probate Record of Louis W. Reif, deceased 13 February 1883, of Sterling, IL
The widow, Ellen Reif, appears before the Judge of Whiteside County, Illinois, stating that her deceased husband, Louis W. Reif, had owned real estate and household furnishings at the time of his death. His two heirs, being herself as the widow Ellen Reif, and their daughter, Florence Mary Reif, were in her sworn statement. She also mentioned that she estimated the total worth of Louis' belongings were about Seventy-five dollars.
Ellen asks that administrator duties be bestowed upon Christian Eisele. And, Christian signs that he has taken the oath as administrator of the estate of Louis Reif. On the second page, the Administrator's Bond is posted as Two Hundred Dollars. But another person has been added as an administrator....Jacob Eisele. So who are Christian and Jacob Eisele? These administrator's assignments do not identify them as family members. Let's check the family tree....
Louis W. Reif had several siblings, one of which was Ernestine Juliane Reif. She married Chrisian Eisele in Whiteside County. So, Christian Eisele was Ellen Reif's brother-in-law. And, after further searching, Jacob appears to be Christian's brother. Nice to have a brother-in-law to step up and help out in a time of despair.
Is this the end of the story? No. There are more papers, I am sure, that had to be filed to make sure that the creditors were paid, property was sold or transferred and any monies due to both Ernst and Louis Reif were transferred to the heirs, before the cases could be considered closed. In this case, both sets of heirs were the widows and daughters of the deceased men. BTW....Ernest and Louis were brothers.
So, if you are interested in looking at probate/wills in your family research, check your county records. And, some are digitized and can be downloaded right to your computer. Check FamilySearch for some of these at www.familysearch.org .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)